Posts

Posted on

COVID ‘mRNA’ Vaccines Never Directly Shown to Do What They’re Claimed to Do

Comirnaty Never Shown To Do What Claimed

Did they say ANYTHING that was true?

Researchers have not directly demonstrated the complete physical input-to-output chain claimed for these products, raising basic questions about what went in and what came out.

The claim is specific: material identified as “mRNA” is injected, and human cells allegedly produce a defined “spike” protein.

This article does not claim that nothing happens after vaccination, nor that the vial contains nothing dangerous.

Biological changes, immune responses, symptoms, adverse events, and death have been reported after vaccination.

And the contents of the vial raise many serious safety questions.

The narrower question is whether the specific molecular identities claimed for the injected material and the alleged translation product have been directly established.

I found no published experiment that demonstrates either of the following:

  • An intact physical molecule recovered from a finished vaccine vial, with a complete experimentally determined sequence matching the complete intended sequence.
  • An intact physical product recovered from a vaccinated human, with a complete experimentally determined amino-acid sequence matching the complete intended “spike” sequence.

Which raises questions:

  • Where is the complete physical sequence (not the “intended” one) of the material injected into people?
  • Why is Pfizer’s “100% maximum sequence coverage” treated as proof of a complete molecule when only 55.6% was said to be uniquely assigned and the remainder depended on repeated-position assumptions?
  • Where is the complete physical sequence of the product allegedly produced inside vaccinated people?
  • How can one reported mass-spectrometry signal (“LDPPEAEVQIDR”) establish the identity of an entire alleged “spike” protein?
  • Why is a mechanism being treated as directly demonstrated when neither the complete physical input nor the complete physical output has been directly identified?

Finish reading:  https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/covid-mrna-vaccines-never-directly

Posted on

Giorgio Cantarini and Roberto Benigni

Giorgio Cantarini and Roberto Benigni

He showed up for his audition alone, without his mother, wearing an enormous overcoat that seemed to swallow his tiny body. Roberto Benigni looked at the little boy and immediately thought he looked like a clown. What he didn’t know was that this child was about to take on one of the most important roles in his film.

It was 1996, and Roberto Benigni, Italy’s beloved comedian, was trying to do something almost everyone around him considered impossible. He wanted to make a movie set inside a Nazi concentration camp. Not a documentary and not a horror film, but a story about a father’s love so powerful that it could create a world of wonder for his child inside one of the darkest places on earth.

His friends told him to give up. He was known as a comedian, not someone who made historical dramas. He wasn’t even Jewish, so some people questioned what gave him the right to tell such a story.

But Benigni knew exactly where the idea had come from, and it wasn’t arrogance. It came from his father.

Luigi Benigni had spent two years in a Nazi labor camp during World War II. When Roberto was a child, his father would sit down with the family at night and tell them about what he had experienced. But Luigi did not describe it exactly as it had happened. He didn’t want to frighten his children. Instead, he told the stories the way a father might explain something terrible to someone he loved, finding the dark humor, the absurd moments, and the small pieces of humanity that somehow survived the horror. He turned something frightening into a story his children could bear to hear.

As Roberto grew older, he began to understand what his father had given him. He realized that this was the film he wanted to make.

He also discovered the story of Rubino Romeo Salmonì, an Italian Jew who had been deported to Auschwitz, survived, and later wrote a memoir that contained elements of bitter comedy. Salmonì had experienced something almost impossible to describe, yet he still chose to look at parts of it through irony. Not because he wanted to minimize what had happened, but because humor was one of the ways he managed to remain human in the middle of it.

Benigni was determined not to get the story wrong. He sent drafts of his screenplay to Jewish scholars and Holocaust historians in Milan. He also consulted the Grand Rabbi of Rome. He knew the subject was too serious to approach carelessly.

The film became *La Vita è Bella*, or *Life Is Beautiful*. It tells the story of Guido, a warm and endlessly imaginative Jewish Italian man who falls in love, builds a family, and eventually watches the Nazis come for the people he loves. Inside the concentration camp, separated from his wife, Guido makes a desperate decision. He tells his young son that everything happening around them is actually an elaborate competition. Points can be earned by following the rules, staying quiet, hiding, not crying for food, and never asking for his mother. The grand prize, Guido insists, is a real American tank.

The little boy believes every word.

And that meant the child playing him had to believe it too. Not pretend to believe it, but truly believe it with the complete trust of a five-year-old who has no reason to doubt his father.

That became one of the biggest challenges Benigni faced.

His solution was remarkably simple. He never told Giorgio Cantarini what the movie was really about.

Giorgio was only five years old and couldn’t read yet, so he learned his lines by listening to them being repeated. At one point, he asked what the word “Jewish” meant because he had never heard it before. Benigni gently redirected the conversation. On set, he played games with Giorgio between takes, kept him relaxed, and made him laugh. Benigni later remembered that sometimes Giorgio would arrive in a bad mood, just like any child can, and his job in those moments was simply to make the boy feel safe enough to play.

That is why the fear on Giorgio’s face in some scenes was real. So was the excitement and happiness. The affection he showed toward the man playing his father was not something he had to manufacture. It was simply the natural trust of a five-year-old who believed the person beside him could turn anything into an adventure.

The audience could feel that honesty because it was genuine.

*Life Is Beautiful* was released in Italy in December 1997 and reached international audiences in 1998. The response was immediate and deeply divided. Some Holocaust survivors wept in theaters. Critics debated whether comedy had any place in such a terrible part of history. Some considered the film dishonest, while others believed it captured something deeply truthful, the idea that when circumstances become unbearable, love can create its own kind of fiction, and sometimes that fiction becomes an act of courage.

Then came the 71st Academy Awards in 1999.

When Roberto Benigni’s name was announced for Best Actor, he didn’t simply walk to the stage. He climbed over the backs of the seats in front of him, scrambling across the theater as the audience erupted in laughter and applause. He finally reached the podium breathless and overwhelmed.

That night, *Life Is Beautiful* won three Oscars: Best Actor, Best Foreign Language Film, and Best Original Score. Benigni became the first person to win the Academy Award for Best Actor for a performance delivered entirely in a language other than English. It remains the only time it has happened.

Three years later, Giorgio Cantarini appeared in *Gladiator*, playing Russell Crowe’s son. He was eight years old and already had an Oscar-winning movie on his résumé from before he was old enough to read.

In later interviews, Giorgio has remembered the warmth of those days on the set. He remembered the man playing his father always making sure he was comfortable and always finding a way to make him smile.

He didn’t understand what they were really making. And that was exactly the point.

A father, both on screen and behind the scenes, had protected the child from the darkness surrounding the story. Giorgio saw only the game. He saw the adventure. He saw a father who wanted to keep him safe.

He never had to see the horror.

*Life Is Beautiful.* Roberto Benigni spent his career believing in those words. And for one extraordinary film, he found a five-year-old boy who believed them too.

Posted on

The Victory Garden

(Tom: I do not endorse the advertiser who posted the story – I have no data on them other than one person’s comment that the seeds come from China and another that they are a reported scam and I did not receive an answer to my email to them – but I do endorse the principle espoused!

Here is my attempt to help you succeed at this endeavour:
Cultivating Life: Growing Food Sustainably
https://www.seedtotable.com.au )

My mum kept a Dig for Victory garden through the war. She kept it going for sixty years after. And what she told me when I was seven years old is the reason I’m writing this right now.

I asked her why she still grew so much food when the supermarket was right down the road. She didn’t look up. She kept her hands in the dirt. And then she said something that didn’t make sense to me until I was standing in an empty supermarket aisle fifty years later.

She said, “Because once you’ve seen the shelves go empty, love, you don’t ever quite trust them to be full again.”

I was seven. I didn’t understand. The supermarket was always full. That was like telling me the sky might turn green.

But she knew something I didn’t. Something that took me thirty four years of teaching Australian history to fully understand. And something that is about to matter to you more than almost anything else you’ll read this week.

Here’s what she knew.

The food system in this country has broken three times in a little over a hundred years. And every single time, the families who had food growing before the shelves became a problem were in a very different position from the families trying to start after.

Not after. Before.

The first time was 1917. World War One. Australia relied heavily on imported garden seed, and when war tore the old supply routes apart, seed became harder to get and food became more expensive. Families started looking at the patch of dirt behind the house differently.

The second time was 1942. World War Two. Food shortages were hitting the Australian home front. Farm labour was short. Drought was biting. Imported seed stock and fertiliser were in short supply. Tea, sugar, butter and meat were rationed. Prime Minister John Curtin launched Dig for Victory and urged Australian families to grow their own vegetables. Backyards. Front yards. Community plots. Whatever useful ground they had.

My mum did exactly that. 2020

She grew tomatoes, beans, peas, carrots, pumpkin and greens. And when the season finished, she didn’t pull everything out and start from zero the next year. She saved seed from her best plants, dried it, stored it, and planted it again when the season came around.

Same tomato. Same quality. Same taste. Year after year. Decade after decade. One seed line. A lifetime of gardens.

Both times, growing food at home and maintaining access to seed suddenly mattered a lot more than people had expected.

Then came the third time.

And this is where it starts to affect you directly.

Supermarket shelves went empty. Not in a history book. In your supermarket. The one you drive to every week. Rice and pasta disappearing. Meat shelves stripped. Limits on ordinary groceries. People looking at each other with that look, the one that says something is wrong and nobody knows exactly how long it will last.

And this time there was no Dig for Victory campaign. No national planting guide landing in Australian homes. No seed programme. No system being handed to ordinary families.

Millions of Australians had the same thought at roughly the same time.

I need to grow some of my own food.

Then they went looking for seeds.

And they couldn’t get them.

Nurseries were stripped. Vegetable seedlings disappeared. Australians who had never grown food before suddenly wanted to start, and seed suppliers were overwhelmed. Some stopped taking new orders. Others sold through stock faster than they could replace it.

The seeds were disappearing before most people had even worked out what they wanted to plant.

Now here’s the part that should make your stomach drop.

The same pattern is forming again.

Right now. While you’re reading this.

I started reading what our own Government is saying about the next few years, and I wish I hadn’t recognised the language.

Australia’s 2026 National Defence Strategy describes our strategic circumstances as dangerous and unpredictable. Hundreds of billions of dollars are being directed into defence capability, national resilience and Australian self reliance. Missiles are being manufactured here. Domestic rocket motor production is being built. New manufacturing capacity is being created because the Government itself says Australia needs to be less vulnerable when conflict or global disruption breaks the supply chains we depend on.

You don’t need to be a defence expert to understand what that means.

The people whose job is to plan for disruption are planning for disruption.

And you are no more prepared today than you were in March of 2020.

Be honest with yourself about that. Because what I’m about to tell you next makes it even worse.

Even if you went out tomorrow and bought seeds, even if you decided right now that you were going to start a garden and take control of more of your own food, the seeds they’re selling you at the shop may not do what you think they’ll do.

This is the part that made me angry. And I taught history for thirty four years, so I don’t get angry easily.

But this made me angry.

And it should make you angry too.

The seeds my mum planted in her wartime garden could reproduce. She’d plant tomatoes, save the seeds from her best fruit, dry them, store them in a jar, and plant them again the next season. Same tomato. Same quality. Same taste. Year after year. Decade after decade.

That was the whole point.

Not going back to the shop every spring and buying the garden again.

Saving what you grew and planting it again.

The seeds on the rack at your hardware store right now are different.

Most of them are hybrids. They grow one season. One harvest. But save those seeds and plant them the following year and the second generation can come back stunted, weak, inconsistent, completely different from the parent plant, or sometimes barely useful at all.

Scientists call it F2 breakdown.

And here’s what you need to understand.

That’s not a defect. That’s the design.

A seed that doesn’t reproduce true is a seed you have to buy again. Every spring. Every year. Another packet. Another charge. Another season where you’re completely dependent on whatever happens to be sitting on the rack when you need it.

They turned your garden into a subscription.

And you didn’t even know it was happening.

Four companies now control more than 60 percent of the world’s seed supply. Every one sells hybrids. Every one profits when growers come back for more seed the following season.

A seed that comes back is a customer that doesn’t.

Meanwhile, there is a Global Seed Vault built inside an Arctic mountain near the North Pole, designed to protect the world’s crop diversity against catastrophic loss.

Think about that for a second.

The world considers seed diversity important enough to protect inside a frozen mountain.

Yet most ordinary families don’t have a single season of saved seed sitting in a jar.

Let me be very clear about where that leaves you right now.

Australia still depends on overseas supply chains for things we use every day, including agricultural inputs and large quantities of vegetable seed. Our own Government is openly spending hundreds of billions strengthening Australian self reliance because it knows global disruption can travel through a supply chain and end up in an ordinary Australian household.

If demand surges the way it did in 2020, you cannot magically create a mature garden that morning.

You either have seed.

Or you’re trying to buy it with everybody else.

My great grandmother never had that problem. My mum never had that problem.

But most of us do.

Not because we’re less capable than they were.

Because they changed what was on the shelf while nobody was paying attention.

My mum understood this sixty years ago. She saved seeds her entire life because she knew one thing most people alive today have forgotten.

A woman with seed in a jar has a future no matter what happens next.

A woman without one is standing in an empty aisle hoping someone restocks the shelf before her family needs what isn’t there.

Which one are you right now?

Here’s the truth I spent thirty four years teaching in classrooms, then watched become real for my own generation in 2020.

By the time you see the crisis on your television, it is too late to start planting for that crisis.

The families with food already growing are the families who started before the shelves went empty.

Not after. Before.

That is not an opinion.

That is the lesson history keeps repeating.

If I’m wrong about what I’m seeing right now, if this pattern breaks and the shelves stay full, you lose nothing. You have a beautiful garden and tomatoes that taste like real food. You learn how to save seed. You start a seed line you can keep building on season after season.

If I’m right, you’ll be the family with seed already in your hands while everybody else is standing in an empty aisle wondering what happened.

I would rather be the woman with the jars.

P.S. My mum kept her wartime garden for sixty years because once she had seen empty shelves, she never completely trusted them to stay full again.

She was right.

2020 proved it.

And the thing she understood that took me fifty years to understand is this:

Buying seeds isn’t the same as owning a repeatable seed supply.

47,000+ families already have theirs.

P.P.S. If you’re still reading this, remember what happened last time.

The shelves emptied. Australians rushed to grow. Seed suppliers were overwhelmed.

There won’t be a fourth warning. Just a morning when it matters whether you started before you needed to.

Don’t be the family in the empty aisle!

MY MUM WAS RIGHT!

Posted on

Free Hormone Booklets

Free Hormone Booklets

Several years ago a naturapath suggested my late wife get some bioidentical hormone creams. The supplier is not making some booklets available that may help women suffering hormone loss. Thought I’d share the link with you. Feel free to pass it on.

“Hormone decline is inevitable and the physical, emotional and mental effects of that decline can be horrible. Did you know there are actually 115 symptoms of hormone decline? You’re probably having some of th em and have no idea they’re hormone related.

I’ve been consulting women on how to balance their hormones for 25 years. To help with that, I’ve written 6 booklets that tell the TRUTH about Hormone Replacement Therapy and how you can replace your hormones all by yourself. Fill in your contact info below to receive the first of those 6 FREE booklets.”

Apply here: https://mailchi.mp/bonvida.biz/c9a4z0lt9l

Posted on

Prostate Data

I saw an ad for a prostate remedy, checked the web site and ran it past ChatGPT. After a bit of to and fro the summary of what helps was:

So if we are looking for a “prostate supplement” hierarchy…

I wouldn’t rank them, because the evidence isn’t sufficiently comparable to justify saying one is the best. But I’d divide them like this:

Most worth investigating further

Beta-sitosterol
Pygeum africanum
Standardised pumpkin-seed extract

Interesting but evidence presently weaker

Crinum latifolium
Lycopene
Other multi-herb formulations

Evidence generally disappointing

Ordinary saw palmetto

And I’d add one very important caveat: none of these should be presented as preventing prostate cancer or as a substitute for investigation of persistent urinary symptoms. The research above is predominantly about BPH (benign prostatic hyperplasia) and LUTS (lower urinary tract symptoms).

Populations with historically low prostate-cancer incidence tend to have dietary patterns based more heavily on plant foods, pulses and traditional staples, with relatively less meat and highly processed food. Some also consume substantial fish or soy, but neither appears necessary to produce a low-incidence population.

And there’s a second, equally important conclusion:

The enormous differences in recorded prostate-cancer incidence between countries cannot be explained by diet alone. Screening, diagnosis, age, genetics, healthcare access and body composition are major confounders.

The full chat: https://chatgpt.com/share/6ab70950-5b10-83ec-a37a-49a8683e24b5

Posted on

Why Your Body Suddenly Ages Faster After 60 (Doctors Rarely Explain This)

Staying Younger Longer

For a lot of people, aging doesn’t happen at a steady pace — it stays gradual for years, then noticeably speeds up during a specific window later in life. In this video, we break down what’s actually happening inside your cells during that shift, from cellular senescence to mitochondrial decline, and the 5 research-backed habits genuinely associated with slower biological aging.

What you’ll learn:

• The difference between your chronological age and your biological age
• The 4 biological processes that compound during this window
• Why “inflammaging” happens and what drives it
• 5 lifestyle factors linked to measurably slower biological aging
• What’s actually worth bringing to your doctor

Click to view the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14btYVULcpE

Posted on

Do you know why doctors and nurses remained silent about all the clots, strokes, etc. after the COVID shot rollout?

Dr In Hospital Corridor

Answer: Because they didn’t want to lose their job. And I wish I was kidding about that.
Steve Kirsch

If you remain silent about what you observe, you get to keep your job. That’s how the medical system works. Do not challenge the “medical consensus.” It is a sacred cow.

Executive summary

After the COVID shots rolled out, critical care units of hospitals were seeing massive spikes in clots and strokes.

Why didn’t they speak up?

Because they didn’t want to lose their job (or their medical license).

I wish I was kidding about this, but I’m not.

I heard this directly from the nursing staff at a large hospital I was just at.

This is why people don’t trust doctors. It’s not the fault of “misinformation spreaders.” It’s because doctors aren’t allowed to tell us the truth.

Finish reading: https://open.substack.com/pub/stevekirsch/p/do-you-know-why-doctors-and-nurses

Posted on

The autism onset chart produced by Dr. Bernard Rimland that nobody can explain

Autism Onset Chart

Whoa! I found the autism onset chart produced by Dr. Bernard Rimland that nobody can explain. Dr. Bernard Rimland, an autism expert who founded the Autism Research Institute, firmly believed vaccines cause autism. I located his original testimony and the graph of the data he cited in Congress.
Steve Kirsch

The officials of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Centers for Disease Control, and other medical organizations claim that since autism typically starts at about 18 months, when the MMR shot “coincidentally”given, the parents are mistaken in their belief that the MMR caused their child’s autism. To examine this issue, Riniland analyzed the data collected by the Autism Research Institute from many thousands of parents of autistic children since the 1960s. The data reveal that the onset of autism at 18 months is a recent development. Parent reports show that through the 1960s, ’70s and early ’80s children autistic from birth outnumbered by 2 to 1 those with onset at 18 months. Starting in the early-1980s, when the MMR triple vaccine was introduced, the picture has reversed: now the “onset at 18 months” children outnumber the “onset at birth” children by 2 to 1.

Executive summary
Dr. Bernard Rimland studied autism for over 44 years, including about 35 years collecting parent reports. He is the founder of the Autism Research Institute (ARI).

He testified in Congress on April 6, 2000.

You can find his full testimony here starting on page 337 including the chart on the shift of the onset age post MMR vaccine.

In this article, I will summarize his key points:

Vaccines cause autism

Authors of papers disputing this will not show their data. They ignored all data requests.

There was a shift in parent-observed onset age from birth to 18 months that happened post-MMR vaccine introduction. It flipped from 2:1 (birth onset:18 mo onset) to 1:2 which is dramatic. Nobody has ever explained it including the current ARI which is now pro-vaccine!

Starting in 1964, parents started telling Rimland their children were normal until getting a DPT shot, a “triple vaccine.” So in 1967, he started systematically collecting data on the child’s response to the DPT shot.

More recently, before his testimony, he was inundated with parents reporting their child was normal until receiving the MMR, another triple vaccine.

You can see the chart Rimland referenced in his testimony above.

You can also watch the full testimony: Dr. Bernard Rimland, Dr. Michael Goldberg & Dr. Mary Megson – Autism & Childhood Vaccines – April 2000.

Key points

These are the four myths he dispells:

Vaccines are safe

No link between MMR and autism. And Taylor refused to supply his data for re-analysis!

Autism is primarily genetic.

Autism “naturally” occurs at 18 months

Key statement:
As a parent and as a full-time professional researcher, I am bitterly disappointed with the medical establishment’s dismal record with regard to autism over the past 60 years. The medical schools, as well as the governmental agencies, have consistently supported outmoded, unproven and even disproven theories from the very beginning, and have actively opposed the most promising approaches for the treatment of autism.

Tens of millions of dollars have been spent on non-productive lines of research, while virtually no money at all has been given to research on the methods of alternative medicine, which are far more promising in terms of both safety and. efficacy.

https://open.substack.com/pub/stevekirsch/p/whoa-i-found-the-autism-onset-chart