A letter from Tasha David, President of the Australian Vaccination-skeptics Network

Hello
Good health is vital for a functioning society. A healthy society translates directly into a happier, more peaceful social group. Australia is made up of many diverse groups – groups who follow different religions, speak different languages and those who raise their family in more liberal environments – and we as Australians are accepting of these behaviours. This tolerance is based on respect for the individual. Here we call it giving people a fair go.
However, it is not giving people a fair go if they are ordered by higher powers to change their beliefs in the way they raise their family. It is not giving people a fair go if they are being coerced into following, what amounts to, a mandatory vaccination program under the threat of financial penalty.
We are campaigning for social health programs to be more transparent. We want the big three – government, pharmaceutical companies and the medical industry – to show honesty in informing people about all aspects of vaccination, good and bad, and to support all individuals in their choice.
If this powerful triumvirate recognises and accepts responsibility for their actions, we as a collective voice for Australian families will have set the path for government-sponsored compensation for injured vaccination victims and promoted a more open dialogue on the health of all Australians.
Tasha David
President
Australian Vaccination-skeptics Network

Why Would My Unvaccinated Kid Be A Threat to Your Vaccinated Kid?

Why Would My Unvaccinated Kid Be A Threat to Your Vaccinated Kid?
A lady called Shirley wondered if people who opposed compulsory vaccination were real, based on her observation of kids with polio and her experience with whooping cough.
I thought, “Fair call, deserves an answer”. So I did two minutes worth of homework:
Shirley, I understand your comments. My mother has similar recollections.
Go talk to a dozen mothers of autistic or deceased children who can trace the day their child died or fell ill to the day the child was vaccinated and the validity of opposition to compulsory vaccination will seem a lot more real to you.
When you look at the autism rate increasing each passing year to the point where it is now about 1 in 60 US kids with an autism spectrum disorder you start to wonder were we better off with the diseases.
Especially since vaccinations have proven to not protect people from getting the diseases.
Let me give you a very over-simplified example.
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_poliomyelitis
In 1952, during the worst recorded epidemic, 3,145 people, including 1,873 children, in the United States died from polio. That same year over 200,000 people (including 4,000 children) died of cancer and 20,000 (including 1,500 children) died of tuberculosis
In 1952 America had a population of 157,600,000 people.
3145 deaths divided by 157M people is very close to 2 deaths per 100,000 people.
Let’s assume 10 times as many people were left debilitated as died. That two disabilities per 10,000 people.
We’re still nowhere near the 1 in 60 currently getting autism.
So on the basis of which does the more harm, obviously the cocktail of vaccinations, toxins and whatever else eventually ends up being found to have caused the current epidemic of sickness (50% of US kids are chronically ill/have food allergies), I wouldn’t put one of my kids within a hundred yards of a vaccine armed medical drug pusher.

Mobile Phone Plans

Mobile Phone Plans
There was a song back in the 60’s that had a line, “Love the one you’re with.”
If part of love is listening to, paying attention to, respecting and admiring, then phones are pretty much beloved.
Some more than people.

Feds Hiding Key Vaccine Facts (mainly, vaccine injury winning cases)

The feds have, without any explanation, removed data about court adjudications. Why would they do this? Because without this information, you can’t know all the people who are winning vaccine injury lawsuits.

(via wnd.com) Former CBS investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson found in March, “the federal government removed the latest vaccine injury court statistics – more than a year’s worth of data – from one of its publicly reported charts … an abrupt departure from the normal practice of updating the figures monthly.”

The data scrub means the government’s “adjudication” chart no longer shows the most recent statistics – and that information drop comes as more and more plaintiffs alleging their children were harmed by vaccines are winning their cases, Attkisson said.

The heat is on for them, mainly because since early 2014, twice as many vaccine injury victims have won twice as many decisions then in the previous 8 YEARS!

(via wnd.com) “Since January of 2014, twice as many victims have won court decisions than the previous eight years combined,” she wrote on her personal website. “In these court decisions, a judge ruled the evidence showed vaccines ‘more likely than not’ caused the plaintiff’s injuries.”

So yeah, this sounds like its really on the up and up. Covering up the amount of court ordered victories is very telling of the level of desperation there is to protect revenue driven vaccine business. Completely deleting data in an effort to cover up the truth which so many of us already know.
http://edgytruth.com/2015/06/02/feds-hiding-key-vaccine-facts-mainly-vaccine-injury-winning-cases/#